🌿 A Note from Patricia:

This post is part of my Informed & Hopeful series—a space for honest, grace-filled reflection on educational policy and the ways it touches real families. It isn’t about choosing sides. It’s about imagining better ways forward—together.

🕊️ New to the Series?

Start at the beginning of the Informed & Hopeful series to explore how educational policy is shaping real families—and why clarity, compassion, and community matter more than ever.

📘 Post One:
👉 What the LEARNS Act Is—and Why It Matters

🏛️ Post Two:
👉 When Funding Becomes a Filter: Thoughts on HB1761

You’re welcome here—whether you’re curious, concerned, or somewhere in between. 💛

---

There’s been a lot of conversation lately around Arkansas’s Educational Freedom Account (EFA) program—who should receive it, how it’s being used, and what fairness really looks like when it comes to funding educational choice.

And while much of the debate has focused on families—who qualifies, who doesn’t—I think it’s time we gently shift the lens and ask:

💭 What about the schools receiving public funds?
Shouldn’t equity extend both ways?

---

🏷️ A Quiet Concern Rising

In the homeschool and school choice communities I’m part of, I’ve started to see more families share the same concern—some quietly, some directly:

“If private schools receive EFA funds, should they still be allowed to charge tuition that excludes lower-income families?”

It’s a fair—and deeply human—question.

Because here’s what happens:

• A family qualifies for funding under the EFA program
• They find a private school that fits their child’s needs
• But the school’s tuition is well above the funding amount—and still out of reach
• They’re offered no sliding scale, no scholarship, no tiered support
• And so, despite being “chosen,” they’re effectively still excluded

That’s not equity.
That’s just a different kind of barrier.

---

⚖️ Accountability Goes Both Ways

If we’re asking families to meet income guidelines and provide justification for how funds are spent, shouldn’t we also expect something of the institutions that benefit from public dollars?

Here are a few ideas being floated in these conversations:

• Tiered Tuition Requirements:
  Schools accepting EFA funds could be required to offer sliding-scale tuition based on income, especially when EFA alone doesn’t cover full cost.
• Transparent Admissions Practices:
  Private schools could clearly outline how EFA students are admitted and what additional costs may be expected upfront.
• Access-Based Incentives:
  Schools that prioritize accessibility (not just selectivity) could receive extra support or recognition for their efforts to serve a broader range of families.

This isn’t about punishing private education.
It’s about aligning our values with our policies—so that school choice doesn’t become school exclusion by another name.

---

🤝 What Real Equity Could Look Like

We talk a lot about leveling the playing field—but true equity is about more than just providing access to the game. It’s making sure the rules don’t quietly favor one group while leaving others behind.

In this conversation, real equity might look like:

• A family of six on a modest income being able to fully participate in the school of their choice
• A neurodiverse child being welcomed without added financial strain
• Schools receiving public dollars honoring the public trust by widening—not narrowing—their doors

We don’t need perfection.
But we do need shared responsibility.

---

🌱 A Gentle Call Forward

If you’re a parent, an educator, or simply someone who cares deeply about the next generation—thank you for being part of this conversation.

I believe we’re capable of building something better.
Something more balanced.
Something that uplifts both families and institutions—because both matter.

Public dollars should serve public good.
And school choice should feel like a real choice, not just a theoretical one.

It’s okay to ask hard questions.
It’s okay to want fairness for everyone.

And it’s more than okay to say:

If we’re going to talk about equity…
Let’s make sure it goes both ways.

With heart,
Patricia